Tuesday, 7 April 2009

Imaginary worlds, part 2


Visiting a world where everything is possible, where evil can be easily defeated by a sword or a spell and where a little hobbit takes responsibility of saving the entire realm and succeeds simply gives us hope, certitude that we can make it. Dou we often doubt in our worth we pleasantly listen to stories like those of J. R. R. Tolkien, where the main character is little and weak but appears the most courageous and important. In “The Lord of the Rings’ the strongest warriors could not oppose the force of The Ring but a little hobbit Frodo Baggins could; we all sometimes feel like a little hobbit, that is why we like this story.



Also when we step into fantasy world like the Middle-earth the thing which is interesting is the fact that there is an evident border line between what is good and what is evil, the choice of which side to assist is easy. Facing evil taking the guise of an orc, Balrog or even Sauron is easier than making choice in the real world – here evil is harder to detect and stand against.



Lastly, hardly anyone has enough time and courage to look for adventures, however everyone sometimes dream of it, that is why we like to at least read about them – to imagine that we are the heroes.

People create imaginary worlds to become somebody they would like to be or live a life that they are not meant to live. They look for respite in their imagination because adulthood is harder than one could suspect. And though there is no way to remain a child forever like Peter Pan or to begin a magical quest like Frodo Baggins, still we can hold the pure joy of life inside our hearts by using our imagination and visiting worlds created by others who did not lose their childish gift.

13 comments:

  1. " ... evident border line between what is good and what is evil ... "
    I strongly recommend you “Ostatni wladca pierscienia” by K. Yeskov, when Middle-earth looks seems to be very real and line between good and evil is very thin and faint.

    Have you read Silmarillion? It’s rather directed to more mature audience. It gives you the “big picture” for Middle-earth I think it’s very illuminating lecture ;)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I personally recommend to book the biggest Tolkien's friend and rival, Clive Staples Lewis. "Who believes in Aslan nowadays?" :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. In my last post i wrote something what is not necessarily true. In this year (or maybe i previous) I've read Jeremy Clarkson's book (i think it's about cars )
    Maybe you also should read it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have to agree with you that reader likes the book if he/she can identify with the main character. I only beat my brains out to know with who Andrzej was identifying himself when reading Clarkson’s book, with author or with the car?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rafal: That is good question... but who was you identifying when reading Barteczko's book?:)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I personally didnt read this kind of books, so its quite difficult to me to comment but anyhow usually when you are identifing with the character you like it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The question is that what you mean by good and evil? Is it real or it is just a product of our imagination. If so, what should decide what is good and evil? The civil or penal code? Politicians or maybe church?

    ReplyDelete
  8. As I said before I am not a big fan of fantasy and this kind of story but I agree with Jacek - when You read any kind of book you usually identify your self with one character (main or not).

    ReplyDelete
  9. As Kiniaz I am not a fan of fantasy, but Lord of the Rings is one of my favourite books. It was a long time before I read it. But when the first movie from trilogy was in cinemas I decided to read it before I see to movie. And I did it.. three times :) Then I saw the movie, I really did not like it. There was so many facts ignored by the director. Big adventure and fairy tail forms is the reason why I like it so much..

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm not a fan of fantasy, but Lord of the Rings the movie wasn't so bad ;)

    ReplyDelete
  11. I haven’t read the books of Tolkien, so It is hard for me to make a reliable judgement. However I do agree with some forespeakers that people usually identify with characters, in most books you have parties to which you can ascribe your liking to, or the other way round- you can totally disagree with them. If the content of the book and rights of different characters were meaningless to you, why even bother to read?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wars, fights, chases, mysterious places, arcane powers and dreadful creatures are so much more interesting then for example studying to a calculus exam. Boring things are so easily omitted in books. For example imagine how interesting were hours, days, years spent by Gandalf studying basics of his mystical education.

    ReplyDelete
  13. To be honest I prefer SF rather than Fantasy. I remember when I first time saw Star Wars I was really impressed. Now when I watch this movie it reminds me "Muppet show" but it has still good story thou.

    ReplyDelete